Serving Bel Air, Benedict Canyon, Beverly Hills. Brentwood, Laurel Canyon, Los Feliz, Malibu, Pacific Palisades, Melrose, Santa Monica, Sherman Oaks, Studio City, Topanga Canyon, Westwood & Hollywood Hills.

Name

E-mail

Canyon News

Bel Air News

Beverly Hills News

Brentwood News

Hollywood Hills News

Laurel Canyon News

Los Feliz News

Malibu News

Melrose News

Pacific Palisades News

Santa Monica News

Sherman Oaks News

Studio City News

Topanga Canyon News

West Hollywood News

Westwood News

Woodland Hills

Celebrity News

State News

National News

World Headlines

Entertainment

Film

Television

Critic At Large... Ruta Lee

Music

On the Industry

Star Gazing

St. John's Confidential File

Theatrical Musings

Hooray For Hollywood

Life & Style

Style Watch

Event Listings

Tech Talk

Looking Good For Lots Less

Spirit & Creativity

Miller Time

Books

Sports

Food

Pets

Pet Tips

Vi's Corner

Point of View

John Armor

Message to America

Labor Week

Ramblings

10 Degrees Cooler

McConnors corner

Edge of the west

Auto

Kyle's Kars

Travel

Susan Michelle's Compass

Advice

Ask Deanna

Dear Lily

Features

Archives

Sports Schedules

Traveling Beyond the Canyon

Edge of the West

Law Man

Ask Us

Nathan Tabor

The Angry Economist

Truth Probe

As I See It

Columnists

Truth Conquers

The Live Wire

Notes from Exile

Letters to the Editor

Dog Training by Anthony

Canyon Mews

Speak!

Sponsors

America's Most Wanted Dogs

World Recipes

Vegetarian Lifestyle

Humor

News Briefs

Local News

Books

News

Canyon Fodder

Bad Movie Night

Critical Projection

Ed's on the Town

Etched in Time Lines

Fitness Quests

Flashback Films

Stories of the Strange

Gourmet Grandma

He Said/She Said

Home Matters with Yvonne

L.A. Etch-a-Sketch

L.A. Ruminations

McConnor's Corner

Mommy Minute

Musically Speaking

My Back Pages

Publisher's Pages

ResourceINK

Scene and Heard in L.A.

Silly...But Wise!

Sunset Diaries

Table Options

The Paws Cause

TV Stuff

Los Angeles News



Letters to the Editor

Letter to the Editor: Socializing the Risk while Privatizing the Health Benefits and Profits, as California's Proposition. 71 does, is Unethical
Posted by Marc Strassman on Sep 17, 2004 - 9:24:00 PM

The basic premise of Proposition 71 is that 30 million Californians should invest $200 each, 6 billion dollars altogether, in bio-medical research designed to understand and use embryonic stem cells to treat terrible diseases such as diabetes, Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's.

If the project is a bust, and no cures are found, the people of California will be, collectively, 6 billion dollars poorer, but at least they'll be able to say they tried, and the scientists, research institutions and real estate developers, slated to receive 25 per cent of the $3 billion in bond money ($750 million), will have something to show for it.

If the project is a great success, if the mysteries of the organism are revealed by the cleverness and perseverance of the scientists funded by the project, resulting in new medicines and treatments that can eliminate the aforementioned and other devastating scourges, who exactly will benefit, either as patients or investors?

Will everyone who votes for, or, more to the point, pays for, Proposition 71 (every taxpaying Californian) be entitled, ipso facto, to free stem cell research-derived treatments based on the work for which they will have collectively paid $6 billion?

Or will these seemingly-miraculous means of restoring cellular vigor be available only to the rich and/or those with the very best medical insurance, while everyone else will need to sit interminably in the waiting room and then be charged hundreds of thousands of dollars they don't have for access to treatments they themselves paid to have developed?

Will the billions of dollars to be earned marketing these phenomenal new treatments in California, in the U.S., and worldwide accrue to the real investors, the taxpaying residents of California?

Or will they go to university medical centers, bio-tech corporations, and the venture capitalists who've created these companies and who have provided the millions of dollars of seed capital to write, qualify, and pass Proposition 71 in the expectation of "cashing out" at the end of the scenario with billions in barely-taxed capital gains, according to laws and regulations they've managed to create by also investing heavily in their favorite politicians' careers?

Not to mention the income they'll derive from buying the bonds themselves and receiving the $3 billion dollars in interest.


Before anyone either votes for or allows his or her tax money to be used to pay for Proposition 71, he or she ought to demand and require that the Legislature and the Governor establish by law a public entitlement to the medical treatments and possibly astronomical financial benefits that they will be making possible with their votes and taxes.

 



 

 

 

Serving Bel Air, Benedict Canyon, Beverly Hills. Brentwood, Laurel Canyon, Los Feliz, Malibu, Pacific Palisades, Melrose, Santa Monica, Sherman Oaks, Studio City, Topanga Canyon, Westwood & Hollywood Hills.