Serving Bel Air, Benedict Canyon, Beverly Hills. Brentwood, Laurel Canyon, Los Feliz, Malibu, Pacific Palisades, Melrose, Santa Monica, Sherman Oaks, Studio City, Topanga, Canyon, Westwood & Hollywood Hills.

Name

E-mail

facebook Canyon News twitter Canyon News

Canyon News

Bel Air News

Beverly Hills News

Brentwood News

Hollywood Hills News

Laurel Canyon News

Los Angeles News

Los Feliz News

Malibu News

Melrose News

Pacific Palisades News

Santa Monica News

Sherman Oaks News

Studio City News

Topanga Canyon News

West Hollywood News

Westwood News

Woodland Hills

Celebrity News

State News

National News

World Headlines

Deaf News

Entertainment

Film

Television

Music

On the Industry

Star Gazing

St. John's Confidential File

Theatrical Musings

Life & Style

Event Listings

Tech Talk

Looking Good For Lots Less

Spirit & Creativity

Miller Time

Books

View from the Hill

NY WEST

Chrystal's Recipe Corner

Career and Life Coaching

Gardening With Tony

Life According To Lenson

Real Estate Realities

Food

Sports

Marathon Running

Keeping It Bruin: A Look Into UCLA Athletics

Baseball

Basketball

Football

Hockey

Pets

Vi's Corner

Pet Tips

Point of View

John Armor

Message to America

Critic At Large... Ruta Lee

Labor Week

Ramblings

10 Degrees Cooler

McConnors corner

Edge of the west

The Physics Wizard

Auto

Kyle's Kars

Travel

Susan Michelle's Compass

Advice

Ask Deanna

Dear Lily

Ask Oona

Features

Dancing with Earthquakes

Archives

Sports Schedules

Traveling Beyond the Canyon

Edge of the West

Law Man

Ask Us

Nathan Tabor

The Angry Economist

Truth Probe

As I See It

Columnists

Truth Conquers

The Live Wire

Notes from Exile

Letters to the Editor

Dog Training by Anthony

Canyon Mews

Speak!

Sponsors

America's Most Wanted Dogs

World Recipes

Vegetarian Lifestyle

Humor

News Briefs

Local News

Books

News

Canyon Fodder

Bad Movie Night

Critical Projection

Ed's on the Town

Fitness Quests

Flashback Films

Stories of the Strange

Gourmet Grandma

He Said/She Said

Home Matters with Yvonne

L.A. Etch-a-Sketch

L.A. Ruminations

McConnor's Corner

Mommy Minute

Musically Speaking

My Back Pages

Publisher's Pages

ResourceINK

Scene and Heard in L.A.

Silly...But Wise!

Sunset Diaries

Table Options

The Paws Cause

TV Stuff

Cartoon of the Week



Santa Monica News

Airport Lawsuit Dismissed By Judge
Posted by Alex Nochez on Feb 16, 2014 - 8:21:29 PM

SANTA MONICA — A United States District Court Judge has dismissed the city's lawsuit against the Federal Aviation Administration for control of the city's airport on February 13.
smairport.jpg
The airport will not close for now.

 

The finding by Judge John F. Walter dismissed all the causes of actions against the United States, thus granting the government's motion to dismiss from January 10.

 

The first cause of action dealt with the Instrument of Transfer from August 1948, which relinquished the government's interest in the property following the conclusion of World War II provided that the city would not use the property for anything other than the airport or functions related to the airport. The United States was allowed to revert that agreement if the agreements made under the Instrument of Transfer were not met.

 

Judge Walter stated in the 17-page dismissal that the statute of limitations for making any claims against the government related to the Instrument of Transfer extended no longer than 12 years after the execution of the act, thus preventing any action against the government related to that specific act.

 

Judge Walter then denied the city's claim that it was not made aware of the government claiming an interest in the property and not following the provisions of the Instrument of Transfer, citing multiple incidents in which the city knew or should have known about the claim to title, including the recording of the act done by the L.A. County Recorder in 1948 and a legal opinion from the City Attorney in 1962 that cited the city's requirement to follow the designations of the Instrument of Transfer. This cause was dismissed with prejudice.

 

The second and third causes of actions have to do with the so-called “Taking Claims,” which alleged that the government violated the Fifth Amendment by effectively taking the property that belongs to the city of Santa Monica without just compensation under the requirements of the Instrument of Transfer. Since the city, according to Judge Walter, failed to seek adequate compensation from the U.S. Court of Federal Claims under the Tucker Act, these causes were dismissed as “premature.”

 

The remaining fourth and fifth causes, dealing with violations to the Tenth Amendment and the Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment, were dismissed for not being “ripe to review,” which means that the claims sought by these causes are based on events that have not occurred yet and may not occur at all.

 

In a statement, City Attorney Marsha Moutrie noted that the dismissal is being reviewed by city attorneys and outside counsel.

 

“Of course we are disappointed,” said City Attorney Moutrie. “But there is likely much work to come, and the attorneys representing the City are already looking forward and focusing our energies on the City's opinions.”

 

Judge Walter also denied a friend of the court brief filed on February 10 by the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) as moot, due to the ruling on the matter.



 

Cliffside Malibu

-------------------------

-------------------------

 

Serving Bel Air, Benedict Canyon, Beverly Hills. Brentwood, Laurel Canyon, Los Feliz, Malibu, Pacific Palisades, Melrose, Santa Monica, Sherman Oaks, Studio City, Topanga, Canyon, Westwood & Hollywood Hills.